The Hendy and Pendle Charitable Trust

Charity Number: 1172754

Annual Expenditure: £0.1M
Geographic Focus: Richmond Upon Thames

Stay updated on changes from The Hendy and Pendle Charitable Trust and other funders

Get daily notifications about new funding opportunities, deadline changes, and programme updates from UK funders.

Free Email Updates

Quick Stats

| Metric | Value |

|--------|-------|

| Annual Giving | £50,000 - £84,000 (estimated) |

| Grant Range | Not publicly disclosed |

| Average Grant | Not publicly disclosed |

| Application Method | Invitation Only |

| Geographic Focus | Richmond upon Thames, Imber village (Wiltshire), UK |

Contact Details

Phone: 01225 319163

No website or email publicly available.

Funding Priorities

  • Preservation of transport heritage
  • Developing public access to the village of Imber (a depopulated village on Salisbury Plain)
  • Relief of those in need, particularly in Richmond upon Thames
  • Heritage bus preservation and operation

What They Don't Fund

Information not publicly available. The trust works exclusively with pre-selected charities and organisations.

Helpful Hinchilla

Ready to write a winning application for The Hendy and Pendle Charitable Trust?

Our AI helps you craft proposals that match their exact priorities. Save hours and increase your success rate.

Learn more >

How to Apply to The Hendy And Pendle Charitable Trust

No public application process. The trust makes grants to pre-selected charities and organisations only. Unsolicited applications for grants are very unlikely to be successful.

The trust operates two heritage buses to preserve them and raise income for its charitable activities.

Similar Funders

These funders have a similar focus and geographic reach:

🎯 You've done the research. Now write an application they can't refuse.

Hinchilla combines funder's specific priorities with your organisation's past successful grants and AI analysis of what reviewers want to see.

Data privacy and security by default

Your organisation's past successful grants and experience

AI analysis of what reviewers want to see

A compelling draft application in 10 minutes instead of 10 hours

References

Spotted something that needs correcting? Let us know