The William Dean Countryside and Educational Trust

Charity Number: 1044567

Annual Expenditure: £0.1M
Geographic Focus: England, Cheshire West & Chester

Stay updated on changes from The William Dean Countryside and Educational Trust and other funders

Get daily notifications about new funding opportunities, deadline changes, and programme updates from UK funders.

Free Email Updates

Quick Stats

| Metric | Value |

|--------|-------|

| Annual Giving | £76,474 (2023) |

| Grant Range | Not publicly available |

| Average Grant | Not publicly available |

| Application Method | No public application process |

| Geographic Focus | Cheshire West & Chester, Congleton area, England |

Contact Details

  • Email: williamdeantrust@gmail.com
  • Phone: 01260 298273
  • Address: 51 Moss Road, Congleton CW12 3BN

Funding Priorities

  • Advancement of education relating to natural history
  • Ecology and conservation of the natural environment
  • Environmental education for children and young people
  • Conservation projects
  • Support for elderly people, people with disabilities, and other charities/voluntary bodies working in environmental conservation

What They Don't Fund

Not publicly specified

Helpful Hinchilla

Ready to write a winning application for The William Dean Countryside and Educational Trust?

Our AI helps you craft proposals that match their exact priorities. Save hours and increase your success rate.

Learn more >

How to Apply to The William Dean Countryside And Educational Trust

No public application process available. The trust operates through trustee discretion. Grants are awarded at the trustees' discretion for charitable purposes within their area of operation.

Similar Funders

These funders have a similar focus and geographic reach:

🎯 You've done the research. Now write an application they can't refuse.

Hinchilla combines funder's specific priorities with your organisation's past successful grants and AI analysis of what reviewers want to see.

Data privacy and security by default

Your organisation's past successful grants and experience

AI analysis of what reviewers want to see

A compelling draft application in 10 minutes instead of 10 hours

References

Spotted something that needs correcting? Let us know