The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Charity Number: CUSTOM_712F8790

Annual Expenditure: £400.0M
Geographic Focus: United States

Stay updated on changes from The David and Lucile Packard Foundation and other funders

Get daily notifications about new funding opportunities, deadline changes, and programme updates from UK funders.

Free Email Updates

Quick Stats

| Metric | Value |

|--------|-------|

| Annual Giving | $400+ million |

| Grant Range | $10,000 - $10+ million |

| Average Grant | $500,000 |

| Application Method | Mixed (invitation only and open applications) |

| Geographic Focus | United States, California, Global Ocean Regions |

Contact Details

Website: https://www.packard.org

Phone:

Email:

Funding Priorities

  • Children, Families, and Communities
  • Climate and Energy
  • Ocean Conservation
  • Science and Engineering
  • Population and Reproductive Health
  • Local Grantmaking (primarily California)
  • Organisational Effectiveness

What They Don't Fund

  • Individuals
  • Political campaigns or lobbying
  • Religious purposes
  • Most unsolicited proposals outside specified programme areas
  • General operating support for organisations outside their focus areas
Helpful Hinchilla

Ready to write a winning application for The David and Lucile Packard Foundation?

Our AI helps you craft proposals that match their exact priorities. Save hours and increase your success rate.

Learn more >

How to Apply to The David And Lucile Packard Foundation

The Packard Foundation uses a mixed approach - some programmes accept open applications through specific funding opportunities, while others are by invitation only. Organisations should check their website for current funding opportunities and guidelines. They have an online grantee portal for managing applications and grants.

Similar Funders

These funders frequently fund the same charities:

🎯 You've done the research. Now write an application they can't refuse.

Hinchilla combines funder's specific priorities with your organisation's past successful grants and AI analysis of what reviewers want to see.

Data privacy and security by default

Your organisation's past successful grants and experience

AI analysis of what reviewers want to see

A compelling draft application in 10 minutes instead of 10 hours

References

Spotted something that needs correcting? Let us know