The Chelsea Square 1994 Trust
Charity Number: 1040479
Stay updated on changes from The Chelsea Square 1994 Trust and other funders
Get daily notifications about new funding opportunities, deadline changes, and programme updates from UK funders.
Quick Stats
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Annual Giving | £57,157 (2024) |
| Grant Range | Not publicly available |
| Average Grant | Not publicly available |
| Application Method | No public application process |
| Geographic Focus | England, Wales |
Contact Details
Address: William Sturges Solicitors, 14-16 Caxton Street, London SW1H 0QY
Phone: 020 7873 1000
Website: None
Email: Not publicly available
Funding Priorities
- General charitable purposes
- Children and young people
- Elderly people
- People with disabilities
- Arts and culture (known supporter of Oxford Lieder)
What They Don't Fund
Not publicly available

Ready to write a winning application for The Chelsea Square 1994 Trust?
Our AI helps you craft proposals that match their exact priorities. Save hours and increase your success rate.
How to Apply to The Chelsea Square 1994 Trust
No public application process. This is a private trust with trustee-led grant making. Grant recipients appear to be selected by the trustees rather than through an open application process.
Similar Funders
These funders have a similar focus and geographic reach:
- The David Cohen Charitable Trust 1982
- Kelmscot Charitable Trust
- The Potel Charitable Trust
- The Cascia Trust
- The W H And A Hawkins Charitable Trust
- The Constance Paterson Charitable Foundation
- The Coysh Family Charitable Trust
- The Blueberry Foundation
- Divya Shanthi Mission Support
- Highworth And District Lions Club Charity Trust Fund
🎯 You've done the research. Now write an application they can't refuse.
Hinchilla combines funder's specific priorities with your organisation's past successful grants and AI analysis of what reviewers want to see.
Data privacy and security by default
Your organisation's past successful grants and experience
AI analysis of what reviewers want to see
A compelling draft application in 10 minutes instead of 10 hours
References
Spotted something that needs correcting? Let us know