Cable Services Group Charity
Stay updated on changes from Cable Services Group Charity and other funders
Get daily notifications about new funding opportunities, deadline changes, and programme updates from UK funders.
Quick Stats
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Annual Giving | £80,000 (2023) |
| Grant Range | Information not available |
| Average Grant | £3,200 (estimated based on 25 charities supported) |
| Application Method | Invitation Only (Employee Nomination) |
| Geographic Focus | UK-wide, Wrexham, Stone, Liverpool, Glasgow, Swindon |
Contact Details
Phone: 1978355477
Website: www.cableservices.co.uk/charity
Funding Priorities
- Advancement of health or saving of lives
- Advancement of citizenship and community development
- National health charities (e.g., Alzheimer's Society, Teenage Cancer Trust, SANDS)
- Local community causes
What They Don't Fund
Information not publicly available

Ready to write a winning application for Cable Services Group Charity?
Our AI helps you craft proposals that match their exact priorities. Save hours and increase your success rate.
How to Apply to Cable Services Group Charity
The charity operates through an employee nomination system rather than accepting external applications. Employees at Cable Services Group branches nominate charities that are meaningful to them or their local communities. There is no public application process for charities to apply directly.
Similar Funders
These funders have a similar focus and geographic reach:
- The Joan Lynette Dalton Charitable Trust
- Hugh Insley-fox Charitable Trust
- The Alma Foundation
- Highworth And District Lions Club Charity Trust Fund
- The Community Of The Presentation Trust
- The Ammco Trust
- Kelmscot Charitable Trust
- The J And D Hambro Charitable Trust
- The Berkshire Masonic Charity
- Yeo Valley Lions Club Charitable Trust Fund
🎯 You've done the research. Now write an application they can't refuse.
Hinchilla combines funder's specific priorities with your organisation's past successful grants and AI analysis of what reviewers want to see.
Data privacy and security by default
Your organisation's past successful grants and experience
AI analysis of what reviewers want to see
A compelling draft application in 10 minutes instead of 10 hours
References
Spotted something that needs correcting? Let us know