Astro Brain Tumour Fund

Charity Number: 1133561

Annual Expenditure: £0.0M

Stay updated on changes from Astro Brain Tumour Fund and other funders

Get daily notifications about new funding opportunities, deadline changes, and programme updates from UK funders.

Free Email Updates

Quick Stats

| Metric | Value |

|--------|-------|

| Annual Giving | £16,733 (FY ending April 2023) |

| Grant Range | Not publicly specified |

| Average Grant | Not publicly specified |

| Application Method | No public process (trustee-discretion) |

| Geographic Focus | United Kingdom |

Contact Details

  • Website: www.astrofund.org.uk
  • Email: treasurer@astrofund.org.uk
  • Phone: 1485525279

Funding Priorities

  • Low-grade glioma (LGG) brain tumour research (Grades 1&2 Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma and Ependymoma)
  • Both adult and paediatric low-grade brain tumours
  • Support services for brain tumour patients and their families
  • Ketogenic diet research for brain tumour management

What They Don't Fund

  • Research outside of low-grade glioma brain tumours
  • Non-UK based organisations (based on historical grants)
Helpful Hinchilla

Ready to write a winning application for Astro Brain Tumour Fund?

Our AI helps you craft proposals that match their exact priorities. Save hours and increase your success rate.

Learn more >

How to Apply to Astro Brain Tumour Fund

No public application process. The charity operates through trustee discretion and has historically made grants through partnerships with Brain Tumour Research's Restricted Funding Scheme. Researchers are welcomed to contact the charity directly through their website.

Similar Funders

These funders have a similar focus and geographic reach:

🎯 You've done the research. Now write an application they can't refuse.

Hinchilla combines funder's specific priorities with your organisation's past successful grants and AI analysis of what reviewers want to see.

Data privacy and security by default

Your organisation's past successful grants and experience

AI analysis of what reviewers want to see

A compelling draft application in 10 minutes instead of 10 hours

References

Spotted something that needs correcting? Let us know